Judge Brodman loses the pro per Defendant’s exhibits for evidentiary hearing. Judge Brodman loses the pro per Defendant’s exhibits for evidentiary hearing. Naturally, the plaintiff’s exhibits were not lost just the pro per Defendant’s. The pro per Defendant did not receive as much time to present his case as a result of the Judge losing the hand-delivered exhibits. The Defendant was severely prejudiced as a result.
Judge Brodman sets oral arguments on a motion that he failed to even read. He states “to be honest I never read the pleadings” and “what are the outstanding motions in this case”. At least he is not a doctor.
Less than honorable Brodman makes up new laws to fit his own agenda. The Defendant files an affidavit to change judges and under Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure the Defendant never received a hearing as required by law.affidavit_to_change_judge_as_a_result_of_rewriting_laws