Defendant. 14 For its complaint against defendant Taylor Made Homes, Inc., plaintiffs Daniel J. Puente 15 and Margaret T. Puente (“the Puentes™) alleges as follows: 16 1. The Puentes 2. Defendant are husband and wife and residents of Maricopa County, Arizona. 17 Taylor Made Homes, Inc. (“Taylor Made”) is an Arizona corporation material hereto, Taylor] 18 with its principal place of business in Gila County, Arizona. At all times 19 Made was transacting business in the State of Arizona. 20 3. Defendant Taylor Made caused events to Therefore, jurisdiction and venue are proper occur in Gila County, Arizona out of 21 which the claims in this lawsuit arose. 22 4. in this Court. 23 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 24 5. The Puentes owned real estate in Gila County, Arizona located at 4131 W. Forest 25 Circle, Pine, Arizona (“the Subject Property”). G:DocsPuenteTaylorlegals4.09.16 Complaint.docx|6. In 2017, the Puentes Contract”) wherein Under Home the Contract, the Home agreed to construct 8. Under as paid Taylor Made 10. The Puentes moved 11 this condition with 12 list items. responded that the cracks 13 concern. leading to the spa. 16 to have 17 relief. noticed in the garage Taylor Made’s In 2019, the Puentes observed the door 20 Puentes notified Taylor Made of these 21 Brazeau assured the Puentes that this 23 reappeared in the same 24 the hallway between one the near the the Contract. Shortly after moving in, a laundry door. The Puentes discussed he was doing punch (“Brazeau”) while Brazeau the result were leading to the spa, settling” and not of “normal to be of and the continued But the wood cosmetic provided some following conditions: door and in the kitchen drywall ceiling. The repairs and Taylor Made performed cosmetic “normal was kind of fill that the front over defects. plus additional the kitchen some impacted wood. for the first time the of Taylor Made year areas of the later used cracking above Within and building plans for the Home in September 2017. floor Taylor Made replaced some separation and Taylor Made 13. in full under Peter owner 19 22 the 2018, gaps in the wood floor appeared in the laundry and hallway In November 12. furnished into the house spider-like crack 15 Subject manner. The Puentes 11. the on applicable law, Taylor Made agreed to construct and 9. 14 single-family residence a according to those plans. the Contract was Taylor Made (“the with contract home. Taylor Made in a good and workmanlike He construction a vacation a 10 18 into Taylor Made agreed to construct Property (“the Home™) to be used 7. entered settling.” repairing the drywall cracking, the cracks large cracks appeared in the walls and the ceiling of laundry. 25 G:DocsPuenteTaylorlegals4.09.16 Complaint.docx14. In 2020, the Puentes the Home 15. from the attached pulling away was for the first time that observed In 2020, the Puentes observed column a level of at the lower wall. stucco pad for the spa was that the for the first time moving and sinking. The Puentes 16. and Brazeau’s continued this settling” and there “normal was conditions newly discovered of the Taylor Made always the same: was response to advise nothing was worthy of concern.
Puente vs Taylor Made Homes Gila county Arizona - Holden Willits PLC
Download PDF