h&b_builders_vs_the_villas_on_lake_mary_coconino_county_flagstaff_arizona
Download File Here
Tag: [email protected]
ZACHARRIAH CHAMBERLAIN vs SKYE ROCHELLE BRODEUR – Maricopa County Superior Court
Dave Wickett vs Matthew and Desiree Neill Pinal County Arizona.
ZACHARRIAH-CHAMBERLAIN-v-SKYE-ROCHELLE-BRODEUR-CV2024027458-COM-Complaint
Dave Wickett vs Matthew and Desiree Neill Pinal County Arizona.
Dave Wickett vs Matthew and Desiree Neill Pinal County Arizona.
Dave-Wickett-vs-Matthew-and-Desiree-Neill-Pinal-County-Arizona
Judge Brodman loses the pro per Defendant’s exhibits for evidentiary hearing
Judge Brodman loses the pro per Defendant’s exhibits for evidentiary hearing. Judge Brodman loses the pro per Defendant’s exhibits for evidentiary hearing. Naturally, the plaintiff’s exhibits were not lost just the pro per Defendant’s. The pro per Defendant did not receive as much time to present his case as a result of the Judge losing the hand-delivered exhibits. The Defendant was severely prejudiced as a result.
Judge Brodman doesn’t read pleadings and doesn’t know the outstanding motions in a case
Judge Brodman sets oral arguments on a motion that he failed to even read. He states “to be honest I never read the pleadings” and “what are the outstanding motions in this case”. At least he is not a doctor.
Judge Brodman makes up new laws to fit his own agenda
Less than honorable Brodman makes up new laws to fit his own agenda. The Defendant files an affidavit to change judges and under Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure the Defendant never received a hearing as required by law.